ICC有很多缺点，但是我确实是感谢它，因为它让我上岸了

很想知道lz转专业的如何胜任senior工作，这特别难吧？

大碗儿茶 发表于 2021-9-17 04:30
话说我今天在研究F1 OPT extension USCIS官网上似乎说雇主不可以是ICC类企业？具体说法好像是说需要雇主和 ...

lz的ICC真的派了lz去工作，并且付给lz工资，那就算真是雇佣关系了呀

劳资派遣没啥问题吧，请问你看的是哪条？

我之前的公司就是老板自己左手开一个公司雇了我，然后派遣到他右手开的另一家公司，据说这么干省税还是怎么滴，形式跟ICC区别不大。他自己还有雇员到我们客户的单位上班。办绿卡没有什么问题。

楼主心态很好，赞一个！

我也是这样过来的，是的大家都知道icc不行，但是有时候眼界放远点。ICC里面好人也很多，他们也确实能教会你很多东西。但是职业发展方面，真的就靠你个人自律自觉去找机会了。

加油楼主，可以发我站内信内推，我也是icc出来的，确实学习了很多但是就是有时候感觉很生气，比如没什么pto，以及有时候让你强制休假，工资没法及时发，糟心的事情很多，但是确实很锻炼人，你只要不放弃总能跳出来的

对我来说，最重要其实就是面子。。。 其他的无所谓。。。

加油！！！

马拉糕 发表于 2021-09-17 07:16:35
很想知道lz转专业的如何胜任senior工作，这特别难吧？

我研究生读的是相关的专业，不过没认真学，和不会也差不多～刚入职那会儿组里还是有比较资深和nice的同事，她教我挺多东西的。不过后来没多久就离职～

xactobear 发表于 2021-9-17 09:44
lz的ICC真的派了lz去工作，并且付给lz工资，那就算真是雇佣关系了呀

劳资派遣没啥问题吧，请问你看的 ...

可能是我没理解清楚吧， USCIS网站上说：


“An employer must have sufficient resources and trained or supervisory personnel available to provide appropriate training in connection with the specified training opportunity at the location(s) where the student’s practical training experience will take place, as specified in the Form I-983. The “personnel” who may provide and supervise the training experience may be either employees of the employer, or contractors who the employer has directly retained to provide services to the employer; they may not, however, be employees or contractors of the employer’s clients or customers.  ”

以及

“Staffing and temporary agencies and consulting firms may seek to employ students under the STEM OPT program, but only if they will be the entity that provides the practical training experience to the student and they have and maintain a bona fide employer-employee relationship with the student. STEM OPT participants may engage in a training experience that takes place at a site other than the employer’s principal place of business as long as all of the training obligations are met, including that the employer has and maintains a bona fide employer-employee relationship with the student. Certain types of arrangements, including multiple employer arrangements, sole proprietorships, employment through ‘‘temp’’ agencies, employment through consulting firm arrangements that provide labor for hire, and other similar relationships may not be able to demonstrate a bona fide employer-employee relationship and, therefore, may not meet the requirements of the STEM OPT extension. ”

感觉ICC似乎说算也算，说不算也不算...

大碗儿茶 发表于 2021-9-17 16:17
可能是我没理解清楚吧，[https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/students-and-exchange-vi ...

嗯有意思，这个还真不太清楚。谁说说怎么样才算bona fide employer-employee relationship