查看: 575| 回复: 1
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

反HR044的网站

全局:

注册一亩三分地论坛,查看更多干货!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册账号

x
本帖最后由 zhensofa 于 2019-7-13 12:36 编辑

这个是一个反HR044的网站,大家可以看看。
https://www.nohr1044.com/about

他们做的ppt也附上了,大家写反对信或者打电话给参议员可以参看
https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/8 ... 21d0546886278e1.pdf




补充内容 (2019-7-13 12:44):
这篇文章也写的不错:https://cis.org/North/View-Left- ... Tax-Bill-Gift-Haves

Arguments Against HR1044 or S386.pdf

2.13 MB, 下载次数: 0, 下载积分: 大米 -1 颗

PPT

评分

参与人数 2大米 +2 收起 理由
Sinbo_Chan + 1 赞一个
Zzw210n + 1 赞一个

查看全部评分


上一篇:No HR1044 & S386
下一篇:S. 386通过概率预测
🔗
 楼主| zhensofa 2019-7-13 12:45:59 | 只看该作者
全局:
The bill favors four already lucky groups of Haves while disadvantaging everyone else:

   1. the high-tech industries that use the H-1B program to increase their already high profits;
   2. the big city (notably Manhattan) real estate developers in the EB-5 program;
   3. rich Chinese in the same immigrant investor program; and
   4. upper crust Indian nationals in the H-1B program.

The Total Losers, and What they Lose

1. American Workers. Any program change that strengthens the H-1B program, which has close to a million semi-indentured workers in it, means that fewer citizens and green card holders are hired in these reasonably well-paying jobs.

2. American Investors. The principal use of EB-5 funds is to provide what is known in the trade as "mezzanine financing", that is loans without liens, to big city real estate developers; routinely EB-5 investors get 1 or at most 2 percent for their money, while the market rate is as high as 10 percent. So U.S. investors are being shunned in favor of EB-5 ones.

I must say that this is not a population to spend many tears on; these are passive investors who probably do not know that they are being discriminated against as they have many other investment opportunities. Though I have been writing about EB-5 for years, it did not dawn on me until recently that this was a group hurt by the program; it certainly is not an organized group.

3. Would-be immigrants from the rest of the world. Generally, for every HR-1044-favored would-be migrant who would get a visa faster there is a non-favored would-be migrant who will have to wait much longer than previously. These are in both employment-based and in family-based migrant categories, so if you are an Argentinian, a Belizean, a Canadian or a Dane, or an Estonian or a Fijian, and you have a green card visa waiting for you, HR-1044 will set back your dreams for years.
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
隐私提醒:
  • ☑ 禁止发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式:找人请去🔗同学同事飞友,拉群请去🔗拉群结伴,广告请去🔗跳蚤市场,和 🔗租房广告|找室友
  • ☑ 论坛内容在发帖 30 分钟内可以编辑,过后则不能删帖。为防止被骚扰甚至人肉,不要公开留微信等联系方式,如有需求请以论坛私信方式发送。
  • ☑ 干货版块可免费使用 🔗超级匿名:面经(美国面经、中国面经、数科面经、PM面经),抖包袱(美国、中国)和录取汇报、定位选校版
  • ☑ 查阅全站 🔗各种匿名方法

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表