狗家不可能裁员的5点理由

转自blind，我觉得说的挺有道理的，狗家底子厚，不会裁员的

• Google has never done a blanket X% cut across the company (perceived or otherwise) to my knowledge.
• Google has made changes in the past that have resulted in layoffs (or whatever term you want to use). Office closures have happened. Orgs have been merged / relocated.
• Google nearly always offers affected employees a way to stay at the company - they might not be feasible for everyone but the options are clearly communicated. I don't have numbers but office closures tend to result in higher numbers of departures due to relocation not being viable for those tied to a particular city.
• Google have lots of financial knobs they can tune to avoid layoffs. Everything from reducing the number of food offerings on site to terminating contractors that work on areas that will need less investment / support during a downturn. Outsourced work (using vendor teams) is something that can be ramped up and down faster than employee counts and with less visibility. You downsize something like geo verification and literally no googlers would notice as the vendors teams are in other locations away from normal Google offices.
• Google has been super disciplined with managing spend for years now. It's really clear from earnings calls how they are managing spend and staying profitable. Even when things suck in the economy they're beating the market's expectations. And I'm not surprised, they probably have one of the best sources for how the economy is doing. Search and ads data provides an amazing level of insight to consumer confidence.
  

试着把“Google”换成十月份的“Meta”，读着也通顺。

meta裁员之前有个差不多的帖子， 说meta是为数不多没有裁员历史的公司， 2008 年都没有裁员， 所以稳得一匹

壮哉我大GCP Cloud AI.

确实今年的food swag减了很多

说的很好啊，狗家是坠吼的公司

读完了，怎么感觉越来越危险？

org名字换一换，公司名字换meta...

熟悉的配方.

你在地里发这个帖子就会被很多人骂。这里不少人进不去狗就盼着狗早日裁员，还要加上地主带节奏扣帽子。

补充内容 (2022-12-17 05:06 +8:00):
很快要置顶支持裁员的层了：“我家地主叫你狗裁员，你狗咋能不裁呢？！”

sci其实已经在变相裁员了