楼主: uGW78
跳转到指定楼层
上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[职场感言] SVB储户们暂时安全了,Fed和Treasury进场兜底,各位打工人可以安心了

   
全局:
怎么保的,印钞票么?
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
bnc 2023-3-13 08:40:54 来自APP | 只看该作者
全局:
那是用什么钱来填?08年大家失业时foreclose的房子难道不是好资产,放30年肯定也回本了。还不是太大不能不救。
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-VC96O  | 添加认证 | 2023-3-13 08:42:41 来自APP
土木转码 发表于 2023-03-12 15:37:51
还控制啥通胀啊,无限印钞加速QE,小银行放心大胆搞投资,反正有人兜底
你是不是对目前的状况完全不了解啊
这和qe有啥关系
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-LW0SL  | 添加认证 | 2023-3-13 08:46:14
我感觉钱是这么出来的。
. 1point3acres
出问题的大头是长期债和MBS,这部分钱的票面价值是足够换储户的。这个价值是保证的,只不过不是现在,而是将来债券到期的时候。现在的问题是,目前的价值已经远低于票面价值了。
.--
那么财政部就要抽调1000-2000亿资金把这些资产买下来接盘。等这些债权类资产到期了,钱自然就回来了。从理论上,就没有花钱,只是临时拆借。问题是财政部本身捉襟见肘,这笔钱从哪里来?估计还要拍卖美国国债解决,等于还是老套路印钱。

小白的一点看法。
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-Z9HIA  | 添加认证 | 2023-3-13 08:46:18 来自APP
反正资产大头是国债 fed直接收了然后打点折把流动性给储户垫上也并不亏钱 只有股东受伤的世界完成了
回复

使用道具 举报

🔗
ucee 2023-3-13 08:46:21 | 只看该作者
全局:
Blausee 发表于 2023-3-12 22:58. 1point3acres.com
联储和财政部明白如果不保存款,明天一堆中小银行也马上被挤兑破产

全额保存款?超过250K的也保?. From 1point 3acres bbs
. From 1point 3acres bbs
还是只是短时注入流动性(就是短期借款以充实现金流动性,之后还是要还给财政部的)?
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-BHGUG  | 添加认证 | 2023-3-13 08:46:33

U.S. says "all" deposits at failed bank will be available Monday

本帖最后由 匿名 于 2023-3-13 01:01 编辑
. ----
Washington post
The Biden administration announced Sunday night that all depositors at the failed Silicon Valley Bank would have access to all their money on Monday morning, approving an extraordinary intervention aimed at averting a crisis in the financial markets.. From 1point 3acres bbs
Authorities said they were also extending protection to depositors of a second bank, Signature Bank of New York, which state regulators closed on Sunday as unease in the financial sector appeared to spread. Separately, the Federal Reserve announced that it was creating a lending facility for the nation’s banks, designed to buttress them against financial risks caused by Friday’s collapse of SVB.

Fed officials declined to provide a specific figure for the size of that new loan program, but made clear it would be large enough to cover trillions of dollars in potential requests.


The series of crisis maneuvers by federal authorities — announced just hours before the start of trading in Asia — reflected the fear that has rippled through the banking sector just a few days after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, which many financial experts thought initially was confined to one part of the economy..
.google  и
The decision by Treasury to backstop all of SVB’s deposits — not just those up to $250,000 that are automatically insured under federal law — will likely ignite a political firestorm over the decision to protect the assets of tech firms, venture capitalists, and other rich people in California.
. 1point3acres
“Today we are taking decisive actions to protect the U.S. economy by strengthening public confidence in our banking system,” a joint statement from the Treasury Department, the Fed and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation said. “This step will ensure that the U.S. banking system continues to perform its vital roles of protecting deposits and providing access to credit to households and businesses in a manner that promotes strong and sustainable economic growth.”
On a call with reporters on Sunday evening, a senior Treasury official defended the administration’s decision as necessary to protect the stability of the banking system and emphasized that the move was aimed at protecting companies and workers who could be harmed by the bank’s collapse — not the bank’s shareholders or executives. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak about internal deliberations, under the conditions of the call.

The Treasury official also said the decision to protect all deposits was made following a recommendation by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Reserve, the nation’s top banking regulators. President Biden was also consulted on the announcement.

Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen stressed in a statement that taxpayers would bear none of the burden of protecting the depositors. Their funds will be backstopped by a pool of money that is regularly paid into by U.S. banks, which has more than $100 billion in it.

The new Fed program will enable banks to pledge U.S. Treasuries and other safe government securities as collateral in return for loans of up to one year from the central bank.. check 1point3acres for more.
. 1point3acres.com
The initiative is aimed at resolving one of the problems that led to SVB’s failure: unrealized losses on government securities that the bank owned. As the Fed raised interest rates last year, the value of those securities fell.

Industry-wide, banks at the end of last year reported $620 billion in such paper losses, according to the FDIC.

Banks don’t lose money if they hold those treasuries until they mature. But if they must sell them to cover depositor withdrawals, the losses appear on their books.. 1point3acres.com

The loan terms are more generous than the bank’s traditional 90-day lending channel. The Fed will lend against the security’s original value rather than its depressed market value, thus potentially allowing banks to delay recognizing their losses for up to one year.

The new program, and the Fed’s support for the SVB and Signature measures, represent “classic central bank panic actions,” according to a Fed official, who briefed reporters on the condition of anonymity.
. 1point 3 acres
The assertions that the decisions do not amount to a “bailout,” however, are likely to be challenged by critics of the move. While the fund going to the depositors is paid into by U.S. banks, it is ultimately backstopped by the Treasury Department — and therefore U.S. taxpayers.

Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization Fund also will provide $25 billion to backstop the Fed loan program, though officials said the central bank “does not anticipate that it will be necessary to draw on these backstop funds.”

“Now is not the time for U.S. taxpayers to bail out Silicon Valley Bank. If there is a bailout of Silicon Valley Bank, it must be 100 percent financed by Wall Street and large financial institutions. We cannot continue down the road of more socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for everyone else,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in a statement.
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-LW0SL  | 添加认证 | 2023-3-13 08:52:59
ucee 发表于 2023-3-12 17:46
全额保存款?超过250K的也保?

还是只是短时注入流动性(就是短期借款以充实现金流动性,之后还是要还 ...
.google  и
全款保。储户可以拿走所有的钱。

公司破产,债权人也许能拿回来点什么,看资产清算出来多少,股东估计要全部清零。
回复

使用道具 举报

全局:
匿名用户 发表于 2023-03-12 17:46:14
我感觉钱是这么出来的。

出问题的大头是长期债和MBS,这部分钱的票面价值是足够换储户的。这个价值是保证的,只不过不是现在,而是将来债券到期的时候。现在的问题是,目前的价值已经远低于票面价值了。
不用新印钱,就把前一阵缩表的时候收回去的钱吐出去就好了。何况这么多长债和MBS不就是fed亲自卖给svb们的吗?然后就咣咣一顿加息。。
回复

使用道具 举报

地里匿名用户
🔗
匿名用户-OZEBJ  | 添加认证 | 2023-3-13 09:01:11
yangmyfly 发表于 2023-3-12 16:33. ----
怎么保的,印钞票么?

好像是US bank 出钱填
然后让 SVB的长期债券尽可能的mature,而不是提前卖。这样就不会亏
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册账号
职场达人
  • ↑ 本版用于讨论职场各种干货话题,闲聊请去🔗聊聊或者🔗匿名版
  • ❌ 本版严禁水贴,引战,发布广告,拉群,贴个人联系方式,扣分无警告
  • ☑ 求职、面经等去 🔗北美求职和 🔗回国求职大区,刷题和学习请去 🔗终身学习大区
  • ☑ 请去专版发布 🔗内推, 🔗招聘信息,和讨论 🔗创业内容
  • ☑ PIP / DevList/ Need Support 等话题也已开设 🔗专版

本版积分规则

>
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表